Re: [Twinsen] [16.7] Circuit Network on belts
Posted: Thu Jan 04, 2018 4:48 pm
Yeah, I'm beginning to think this may be the root of it all, the zero signal or absence there of. I do agree, though, that we shouldn't have all signals present if they're zero. IMO, it should be that an absence of a signal type should be considered and treated as if that signal type is zero. Provided that Everything and Anything are left to test against only detected signals, they should work fine. The only change would be when there's no signal, they just treat it as an absolute zero and then compare as normal.
I am curious, though, where having Everything default to True and Anything default to False in the absence of a signal is useful that can't be solved in another fashion? I mean, if we're testing for an absence of a signal, but we treat this as 0, then testing as Everything = 0 and Everything <> 0 should yield the same results, shouldn't it?
I am curious, though, where having Everything default to True and Anything default to False in the absence of a signal is useful that can't be solved in another fashion? I mean, if we're testing for an absence of a signal, but we treat this as 0, then testing as Everything = 0 and Everything <> 0 should yield the same results, shouldn't it?