Bug report that is not a duplicate was moved to duplicates
Posted: Sat Dec 21, 2024 8:59 pm
124885 describes multiple issues, but the title clearly references 2.0.28
Loewchen replied to that with 124743, which describes a crash in 2.0.24, not in 2.0.28.
My post contains 124743, but does not only consists of 124743.
124743 does not fully describe my post 124885.
Why is 124885 a duplicate, then, if 124743 only applies to 2.0.24 and not to the main issues described in 124885?
Edit: 2.0.24 up to 2.0.27, but not 2.0.28
I did not encounter this, but a different crash in 2.0.28, as described in my post.
Loewchen replied to that with 124743, which describes a crash in 2.0.24, not in 2.0.28.
My post contains 124743, but does not only consists of 124743.
124743 does not fully describe my post 124885.
Why is 124885 a duplicate, then, if 124743 only applies to 2.0.24 and not to the main issues described in 124885?
Edit: 2.0.24 up to 2.0.27, but not 2.0.28
I did not encounter this, but a different crash in 2.0.28, as described in my post.