Page 1 of 1

[2.0.70] Robot requests for Robo Ports don't work?

Posted: Wed Oct 15, 2025 7:47 pm
by hgschmie
This is a regular roboport. It has an outstanding Robot request for 50 construction robots. It also has 50 logistics robots stored inside that are ready to move things.

Next to the roboport is a storage chest with 50 construction robots. Yet, the request is red and it has satisfaction of 0/50.
Screenshot 2025-10-15 at 12.40.51.png
Screenshot 2025-10-15 at 12.40.51.png (841.99 KiB) Viewed 222 times



If I look at the innards of the roboport, it has a single LuaLogisticPoint, which is a passive provider?!? Shouldn't that be a requester? And also, the requests are not listed in the sections (as they would be with a requester):



Screenshot 2025-10-15 at 12.46.29.png
Screenshot 2025-10-15 at 12.46.29.png (105.5 KiB) Viewed 222 times

Re: [2.0.70] Robot requests for Robo Ports don't work?

Posted: Wed Oct 15, 2025 7:54 pm
by eugenekay
As the Tooltip says, "Robot requests" only affects Bots which are already Members of the Network; you need to use an Inserter to move them from the Chest (where they are "Items") into the Roboport.
10-15-2025, 16-05-54.png
10-15-2025, 16-05-54.png (77.1 KiB) Viewed 202 times
10-15-2025, 15-57-59.png
10-15-2025, 15-57-59.png (152.78 KiB) Viewed 208 times
Good Luck!

Re: [2.0.70] Robot requests for Robo Ports don't work?

Posted: Wed Oct 15, 2025 10:50 pm
by hgschmie
Thanks for the explanation. However, then what is the passive provider logistic point within the roboport used for?

Re: [2.0.70] Robot requests for Robo Ports don't work?

Posted: Wed Oct 15, 2025 11:01 pm
by eugenekay
It provides the count of "Repair Packs" stored in the Roboport. This allows Construction Bots to store them in a convenient location, instead of having to fly back/forth from a Storage Chest each time.
10-15-2025, 19-00-04.png
10-15-2025, 19-00-04.png (133.78 KiB) Viewed 156 times
10-15-2025, 19-00-25.png
10-15-2025, 19-00-25.png (27.99 KiB) Viewed 156 times

Re: [2.0.70] Robot requests for Robo Ports don't work?

Posted: Thu Oct 16, 2025 5:03 pm
by hgschmie
Oh, that was non-obvious to me. Thanks for the explanation!