This can apparently be closed as a duplicate. I'd searched the Bug Reports forum, but apparently it popped up over in modding interface already.
viewtopic.php?p=666303
Search found 4 matches
- Sat May 31, 2025 8:40 pm
- Forum: Duplicates
- Topic: [2.0.54] Lightning Rods don't honor editor "Ignore Surface Conditions"
- Replies: 1
- Views: 152
- Sat May 31, 2025 8:36 pm
- Forum: Duplicates
- Topic: [2.0.54] Lightning Rods don't honor editor "Ignore Surface Conditions"
- Replies: 1
- Views: 152
[2.0.54] Lightning Rods don't honor editor "Ignore Surface Conditions"
I was in the editor mode, with "Ignore surface conditions" enabled. Tried to place a lightning rod and got the pictured error.
05-31-2025, 13-31-33.png
I'd hoped to be able to place and potentially preview the coverage area inside a planning save.
(Yes, I'm aware that, as a workaround, I can ...
05-31-2025, 13-31-33.png
I'd hoped to be able to place and potentially preview the coverage area inside a planning save.
(Yes, I'm aware that, as a workaround, I can ...
- Mon May 12, 2025 8:26 pm
- Forum: Resolved Problems and Bugs
- Topic: [2.0.48] Biter nest dont count as blocked for inserters
- Replies: 10
- Views: 1217
Re: [2.0.48] Biter nest dont count as blocked for inserters
I do think this is a bug upon testing it. My steps to reproduce (assuming cheat/editor mode):
1) Place a captured biter spawner, giving it no food.
2) Place an inserter feeding it from a chest. In the chest, place some Spoilage. (Simulating expired bioflux)
3) Note: The inserter will not insert ...
1) Place a captured biter spawner, giving it no food.
2) Place an inserter feeding it from a chest. In the chest, place some Spoilage. (Simulating expired bioflux)
3) Note: The inserter will not insert ...
- Mon Apr 14, 2025 5:13 pm
- Forum: Ideas and Suggestions
- Topic: Allow more functions to be used in blueprint parameterization
- Replies: 3
- Views: 460
Re: Allow more functions to be used in blueprint parameterization
Adding to this request in hopes of getting "clamp" available. If I recall correctly, "clamp" is already implemented in the scope of a noise expression, but it's not in the base MathExpression .
I was experimenting with a parameterized BP for a bot-based mall assembler, and I hoped to do something ...
I was experimenting with a parameterized BP for a bot-based mall assembler, and I hoped to do something ...