Gonna +1 this as well. I ran into this issue when attempting to ctrl+x and then h-flip a bit of plumbing with valves. Considering others' reports that this happened with ctrl+c or ctrl+x, I also attempted to just alt+b to blueprint it and flip as a blueprint and still got a hard crash.

Full stack ...

TL;DR:
When the Selector Combinator is set to Stack Size mode, it should include fluid signals in its output with a stack size of 1 for each.

What?
The Stack Size mode of the Selector Combinator currently only outputs the stack size for items that can be stored in dry storage containers. While ...

Hmmm, alright then. I'll have to figure out how to do that.

I've just had an idea for a potential mod that would require changing the base_level of a given entity's fluid_box during gameplay.

Does anybody know if this is possible to do?

Since we're definitely in the process of adding QoL circuit network behavior to various entities for 2.0, I have a request along those lines:

Can we also get storage containers able to report some more useful statistics? I have a few cargo station designs that I would like to be able to more ...

An RS latch function would also be nice to have. Bonus points, even, if it also has hysteresis thresholds that can be set.

I guess it has been posted in this thread before, but a single decider combinator 2.0 can work as complete RS latch with hysteresis because of its multiple condition ...

An RS latch function would also be nice to have. Bonus points, even, if it also has hysteresis thresholds that can be set.

I guess it has been posted in this thread before, but a single decider combinator 2.0 can work as complete RS latch with hysteresis because of its multiple condition ...

Actually, now that I've had time to reflect on it, I think I also want to add to whatever chorus might exist about decider combinators:

An RS latch function would also be nice to have. Bonus points, even, if it also has hysteresis thresholds that can be set.

This might make the decider combinator ...

This has probably already been suggested somewhere in this thread, but...! I'll add to the chorus if it has been!

Custom lamp colors could be set via circuit network by sending red, green, and blue circuit signals to them, with values ranging from 0 to 255. A lamp would need all three color signals ...

I really do hope that this can be optionally modded to allow bots, because I can tell you right now I'm not going to enjoy being forced into pure belt logistics just to be able to ferry crap to another world. :(


I would be very surprised if mods can't add robots to the platforms. Though ...

We brainstormed many ideas, but the simplest and easiest solution won out: "Players can push locomotives with their feet, flintstone style" .

It isn't very powerful or fast, so isn't really usable in normal situations, but for an emergency it gets the job done.

Given that the player can ride ...

mrvn wrote: Thu Mar 21, 2024 11:51 pm If only there where instant through holes. A wire with one side red and the other side green.

I could suggest an arithmetic combinator set to Each+0=Each to accomplish that.

Changing the graphics I think would be the least problem. I'm pretty sure there are lots of cases where the code basically reads:

for (i = 0; i < 2; ++i) { ... } instead of for (i = 0; i < MAX_WIRES; ++i) { ... } . That goes for mods too.

As for overcomplicating ... I would guess the opposite ...

First I would just want to have 3 or 4 colors for the wire. The interface already has 2 so enlarging that to 4 should not be such a daunting path.


Oh, yeah, definitely. Having a couple of extra circuit network channels would be nice. But I suspect that the idea may get turned down as ...

I'll be honest I am suuuuuper not jazzed for the belt logistics puzzle that space platforms are going to be, and it's the one big thing that I think is going to make Space Age a huge slog for me. I don't like dealing with belt logistics or belt spaghetti. It takes me an obscene amount of thinking to ...

Oh HECK YES!! Getting more circuit control behavior on more entities is a BONUS!! :D

I have a request along those lines, now that we can see the gates are opened for expanding vanilla circuit control behaviors:

Can we also get storage containers able to report some more useful statistics? I have ...

I'mm'a wake this thread back up a bit because I dunno if anybody else has asked about it but I would like to know:

Since y'all have certainly gone in and massively re-worked whole chunks of game code for both previous and subsequent FFF features, would it be possible to also overhaul the circuit ...