Thanks, very usefull.
It would be cool if you attached the script that you used to do this. So that anyone can update this combinator if additional mods are used.

I really like the quality mechanic, but looking at how many players use it, I noticed that many do not use quality levels except legendary. In practice, this happens like this, the player ignores quality until the late stage of the game, and then immediately crafts legendary items. It seems to me ...

boskid wrote: Wed Sep 10, 2025 9:37 am I know i know, i looked at the unreleased 2.0.67 where it was already changed by Bilka and i did not realize it was changed. It is fixed for 2.0.67 so relax.

You answer faster than I write my answers on the phone. Problem is solved. Thank you!

I changes these techs for 2.0.67 a week ago for my own convenience. However, as boskid notes, this is an allowed and supported format.


Thanks. Its a valid format, I agree, but it's a bit inconsistent that 3 out of 100 technologies behave differently for no apparent reason. When I was iterating ...

Its strange. I am playing standalone versions from factorio.com on PC that isnt connected to the internet, so I attach photos from smartphone, sorry about that.

I have various standalone versions and in both 2.0.65 and 2.0.55 fish-breeding technology store that value in "count_formula".

And if in ...

Hello.
Im writing this not from my PC, but from smartphone, so no screenshots.
But it easy to reproduce.
If you search "quality" in technology GUI, it would find: "quality module 1", "epic quality", "legendary quality". But dont find "quality module 2" and "quality module 3" for some reason.
Thanks.

Hello.
I'm currently making a mod (thanks for such a great API), and I've discovered three technologies where the number of packs is specified in the wrong field. All three technologies (fish breeding, promethium science pack, foundation) are not infinite, but their packs values are specified in the ...

I want to add, that it will also be usefull if this field could be setted in parametrization.
Thanks.

Something tells me that this arrangement of these stromatolites was not intended.

seed 1501660311
location -218, 122