It's common knowledge that hardly bears repeating, but for completeness, note that cargo pod drops can target more than just the starting area via placing then deconstructing the landing pad / cargo bays.

Dropped cargo pods damage or kill any engineer caught underneath them.

However, if they land on top of enemies of any type, they do no damage.

It shocks me that such a game-breaking bug went unnoticed in one of the most obvious and intuitive methods for dealing with enemies.

Please rectify this ...

In Factoriopedia, biter eggs show the same damage effect as the biters they spoil into. As far as I know there's no way to take damage from the eggs themselves.

Relevant: viewtopic.php?t=131281 sounds like it solves the fluid side of this for 2.1.

Note: It sounds like this solves the fluid case of viewtopic.php?t=118708

It'd be nice/consistent if solids got a similar change to stay in the ingredients slot for compatible recipes.

Some examples under their proposal, where A-target is the target station, A-duplicate is a non-target station of the same name, and B is a station with a different name.


train ==== A-duplicate <disconnect> A-target | TARGET FULL
train ==== B <disconnect> A-target | NO PATH
train <disconnect> A ...

I think their precise request is not "figure out whether that was the intended station via mind-reading", it's "do not show No Path if another station of the same name exists that IS reachable", which is unambiguous and seems completely feasible if performance weren't a concern.

Now, calculating ...

This also gives more variety in how you get to high quality products. I already have to do upcycling a bunch of times, I don't see why that should have to be the solution in ALL cases. In return for having quality in crushers we get all this sweet extra complexity and interesting chains ...

https://forums.factorio.com/viewtopic.php?t=127596 was closed as Not A Bug, stating this is intended behavior. I suspect that thread is graveyarded and will not be seen again.

I'd like to motion to appeal that decision, because at the end of the day there are two different behaviors happening:
Case ...

The use case is a make-anything mall that includes multiple machine types, BOTH foundry and assembler. I prefer the mall to use the Foundry when possible, due to the prod bonus. So, for example, the mall might try to set a regular gear recipe on the Foundry, see the recipe successfully get set (by ...

> Circuit set-recipe will ignore quality for fluid-input-only recipes (as intended).

What are the upsides of this as intended behaviour? To my understanding, the game largely tries to treat different qualities as different items in most aspects (e.g., requests don't do any magic generalizations ...

Doesn't cover absolute units but code with rate scaling info from Rseding: https://old.reddit.com/r/factorio/comme ... ?context=2

Cross-posting https://forums.factorio.com/viewtopic.php?t=127371 as I think this might be considered a bug not a feature quirk.

TL;DR set_recipe(foundry, uncommon_iron_gear) -> common_iron_gear recipe gets set, instead of no recipe like for other impossible items.

I think that a machine setting a ...

Upon further reflection, failing to set even when quality modules are present is more consistent, because any intentional-gambling setup would already have to set machine recipes to one quality tier lower than what they're gambling for - so any machine setting a different tier than they send would ...

Ah sneaky, my bad. Thanks!

When cutting and pasting a mid-craft assembling machine on a space platform, instead of being re-built at the destination, a ghost at the destination remains and the assembler is nowhere to be seen in the platform's inventory. I also checked and didn't see it getting dropped to the planet.

As best ...

* Failing to set is more consistent. Machines already set no recipe if given an item they cannot create.

* Failing to set is more visible. This sort of circuitry is often fulfilling random logistic requests, not necessarily something the player directly set and is checking the status on. If I run ...

TL;DR
Machines can set an incorrect recipe in some Set Recipe edge cases, when they should set no recipe.

What?
Current behaviour: When using circuit Set Recipe to request a quality item (e.g. uncommon iron gear), if the machine's matching recipe has only fluid ingredients (e.g. the Foundry's ...

Yes, but as far as I can see, there's literally no downside to enabling it in vanilla too with this approach. The design-breakages are the only major reason I've seen given not to do this, which this bypasses. The worst I can see is that it makes the lack of upgrades to fluid wagons even more ...

This is Yet Another thread requesting that quality train wagons have increased inventory capacity.

However, every other topic on this seems to get mired down by the claim that upgrade-planning wagons would break existing builds that depend on the max capacity. There is a simple solution that avoids ...