I know that they are not exactly the same, but my reason of linking it was that that was an example where constant combinators were explicitly made to wraparound, potentially being the source of this inconsistency. I also seem to recall (but am not able to verity at the moment) that they all ...

To reproduce:
In a constant combinator, add a signal and make its count 9876543210
Similarly, in a decider combinator, change the constant being compared to to 9876543210

Actual result:
The constant combinator gets a value of 1286608618 [wraparound]
The decider combinator gets a value of ...