Thank you for answers. I will try to use Each. I was under (wrong) impression that they share memory of what they filteres, which is obviously wrong assumption.
But still I think tooltip can be more clear.
Something like:
If any of the input signals meet the condition, it will pass all of them.
Search found 2 matches
- Sun Mar 01, 2026 7:49 am
- Forum: Not a bug
- Topic: [2.0.73] Decider combinator with ANYTHING on both sides sends wrong output signal
- Replies: 7
- Views: 569
- Sat Feb 28, 2026 5:24 pm
- Forum: Not a bug
- Topic: [2.0.73] Decider combinator with ANYTHING on both sides sends wrong output signal
- Replies: 7
- Views: 569
[2.0.73] Decider combinator with ANYTHING on both sides sends wrong output signal
Im trying to find any signal bigger than 0 and return it.
Decider detect there is any signal true to the condition, but return different signal.
Tooltip of ANY:
obrazek.png
For this setup, I would expect to return B or C, but it returns A:
obrazek.png
When I change A to D, it returns B ...
Decider detect there is any signal true to the condition, but return different signal.
Tooltip of ANY:
obrazek.png
For this setup, I would expect to return B or C, but it returns A:
obrazek.png
When I change A to D, it returns B ...