Search found 28 matches
- Wed Mar 04, 2020 2:30 pm
- Forum: Technical Help
- Topic: Fragment 0000 failed too many times
- Replies: 6
- Views: 2952
Re: Fragment 0000 failed too many times
Not sure if that's true as steam version was doing same thing (all steam does is launch the game with a connected steam id nothing els)
- Tue Mar 03, 2020 10:40 pm
- Forum: Technical Help
- Topic: Fragment 0000 failed too many times
- Replies: 6
- Views: 2952
Re: Fragment 0000 failed too many times
That message is just a cryptic way of saying no response was received from the server. In other
It's a bit annoying because it's doesn't seem to stop most others from joining (I attempt from laptop and 2 mobile phones different network one ipv6 enabled) it probably is just port forwarding not ...
- Tue Mar 03, 2020 6:08 am
- Forum: Technical Help
- Topic: Fragment 0000 failed too many times
- Replies: 6
- Views: 2952
Fragment 0000 failed too many times
17.79 stable this is but same on 18.9 on other server that it can't reach that are working for others
Fragment 0000 failed too many times
could this be caused if the server host is a shared server or due to port forwarding , its quite annoying as everyone els can connect but not me (tethered using ...
Fragment 0000 failed too many times
could this be caused if the server host is a shared server or due to port forwarding , its quite annoying as everyone els can connect but not me (tethered using ...
- Tue Jan 28, 2020 1:54 pm
- Forum: General discussion
- Topic: CPU performance benchmarks
- Replies: 169
- Views: 109353
Re: Anyone Ryzen Benchmarks?
Most ideal for ryzen is 1800 if ( infinity fabric) and 3600 lowest Cl timing possible (do make sure benchmark between changes as stable does not mean faster on ryzen)
looking at getting 2x16gb G.Skill Neo 16cl kit (might run at Cl 14, also might do 3800 cl14 as well) and a 3800x to try and get ...
looking at getting 2x16gb G.Skill Neo 16cl kit (might run at Cl 14, also might do 3800 cl14 as well) and a 3800x to try and get ...
- Sat Jan 25, 2020 10:48 pm
- Forum: General discussion
- Topic: CPU performance benchmarks
- Replies: 169
- Views: 109353
Re: Anyone Ryzen Benchmarks?
Then your bottleneck might be RAM, rather than CPU ?
https://www.cpubenchmark.net/compare/Intel-i5-6400-vs-Intel-i7-9700K/2578vs3335
50% faster single-threaded !
(Or maybe the cooling + turbo, since TDP is 50% higher too..?)
in my tests, the motherboard + memory is the same. Only the ...
- Sat Jan 25, 2020 9:49 pm
- Forum: General discussion
- Topic: CPU performance benchmarks
- Replies: 169
- Views: 109353
Re: Anyone Ryzen Benchmarks?
Some fresh results with
https://factoriobox.1au.us
The same processor, three different versions of the game:
Factorio 0.18.1 - 101 UPS
Factorio 0.18.0 - 101 UPS
Factorio 0.17.79 - 91 UPS
same motherboard but with old i5-6400 (not K)
Factorio 0.17.79 - 91 UPS
Oddly enough, but the result in version ...
- Fri Nov 15, 2019 2:33 am
- Forum: General discussion
- Topic: CPU performance benchmarks
- Replies: 169
- Views: 109353
Re: Anyone Ryzen Benchmarks?
once i get time i post my 1800x results
Also version to be used should it be version 17.59 as 17.60 and later recipes was changed witch will deactivate a lot of building in the test map used
(guess I test both see what it does)
Also version to be used should it be version 17.59 as 17.60 and later recipes was changed witch will deactivate a lot of building in the test map used
(guess I test both see what it does)
- Fri Nov 15, 2019 2:27 am
- Forum: General discussion
- Topic: CPU performance benchmarks
- Replies: 169
- Views: 109353
Re: Anyone Ryzen Benchmarks?
If people are intersted and have some heavy up-to date save I can run some tests on Ryzen 3700X with 3200 ram.
i am interested
i am still in between getting the 3800x or the 9900k or ks with 3600 ram (ideally get latency down to 16cl from 18cl) from what i have looked at the 9900k is the ...
- Wed Aug 07, 2019 6:15 am
- Forum: General discussion
- Topic: CPU performance benchmarks
- Replies: 169
- Views: 109353
Re: Anyone Ryzen Benchmarks?
I'm kind of itching to get one but might wait a bit since there is no good info on 3800X still - it seems it's not available yet.
3700x vs 3800x at best is 2% difference for Β£100 more not really worth it unless you want he best (just use a better cooler and the 3700x will clock to same as 3800x ...
- Tue Jul 09, 2019 5:04 pm
- Forum: General discussion
- Topic: CPU performance benchmarks
- Replies: 169
- Views: 109353
Re: Anyone Ryzen Benchmarks?
It would be interesting, map test on the 3700x and 3900x and 3950x
One important note is that you don't want the game to be chip let/ccx hopping on the 3700x/3900x windows 10 task Scheduler is still not keeping work on one 8 core ccx group, so more ideal if you limit it to first 8 threads for ...
One important note is that you don't want the game to be chip let/ccx hopping on the 3700x/3900x windows 10 task Scheduler is still not keeping work on one 8 core ccx group, so more ideal if you limit it to first 8 threads for ...
- Mon Apr 23, 2018 8:36 pm
- Forum: Releases
- Topic: Version 0.16.37
- Replies: 10
- Views: 15132
Re: Version 0.16.37
has any network tweaking been done as in 16.36 on a long map that is 100-180MB it is dropping the connection at 80-90% (getting full 10MB/s from server then it suddenly stops, sometimes shows a server not responding progress bar)
- Sun Feb 04, 2018 9:33 pm
- Forum: Desyncs with mods
- Topic: [16.22] desync on join ForceFields 2.1.0
- Replies: 0
- Views: 1321
[16.22] desync on join ForceFields 2.1.0
if server is restarted i can join (happens to others as well)
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1JZnXRr ... Yds1H8arx2
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1VEkU9k ... NOtBgGyDij
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1PjZTcC ... 9swvxwj_pf
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1JZnXRr ... Yds1H8arx2
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1VEkU9k ... NOtBgGyDij
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1PjZTcC ... 9swvxwj_pf
- Thu Dec 14, 2017 2:20 am
- Forum: General discussion
- Topic: CPU performance benchmarks
- Replies: 169
- Views: 109353
Re: Anyone Ryzen Benchmarks?
102 zoomed out max and 110 default zoom (only done the game speed command)
map view dropping as low as 70 UPS
map view dropping as low as 70 UPS
- Wed Dec 13, 2017 10:56 pm
- Forum: General discussion
- Topic: CPU performance benchmarks
- Replies: 169
- Views: 109353
Re: Anyone Ryzen Benchmarks?
Same here on my ryzen system it's doing 60 ups now
I did not think about uncapped ups I be back 2 hours and I can uncap the ups to see what I am getting
Ryzen 1800x 8 core 3.92 (reported voltage under load 1.4v) , 32gb ram 16cl @2933 as system wount post at 3200 (corsair 3200 LPX 16cl 2x16gb kit ...
I did not think about uncapped ups I be back 2 hours and I can uncap the ups to see what I am getting
Ryzen 1800x 8 core 3.92 (reported voltage under load 1.4v) , 32gb ram 16cl @2933 as system wount post at 3200 (corsair 3200 LPX 16cl 2x16gb kit ...
- Tue Dec 05, 2017 12:13 am
- Forum: General discussion
- Topic: CPU performance benchmarks
- Replies: 169
- Views: 109353
Re: Anyone Ryzen Benchmarks?
@aober93
What is your system spec mobo and ram
It's amazing there is so much difference I get about 22 ups on that map at the 60 second mark (think that is where you need to log it at) and the avg after that is floating around that number
I did slightly make a mistake going down the ryzen route ...
What is your system spec mobo and ram
It's amazing there is so much difference I get about 22 ups on that map at the 60 second mark (think that is where you need to log it at) and the avg after that is floating around that number
I did slightly make a mistake going down the ryzen route ...
- Mon Sep 04, 2017 5:21 am
- Forum: General discussion
- Topic: CPU performance benchmarks
- Replies: 169
- Views: 109353
Re: Anyone Ryzen Benchmarks?
On the note of poor single threaded performance on ryzen is that a assumption as ryzen cpu is not that far off an Intel cpu now (within 10% assuming the Intel cpu is overclocked) ryzen is not bulldozer (the type A or FX cpus with core assist)
one thing I have noticed as I have been doing some ...
one thing I have noticed as I have been doing some ...
- Mon Sep 04, 2017 3:40 am
- Forum: General discussion
- Topic: CPU performance benchmarks
- Replies: 169
- Views: 109353
Re: Anyone Ryzen Benchmarks?
on this map (did not bother with the mods) on 15.33 http://www.tuwr.net/~factorio/factory%201%20-%20568hr.zip
well i get about 18 UPS on my i7-920 + 3.4Ghz (24GB ram stock speeds)
the ryzen 1800x @ stock gets about 23 UPS, guess if i lock the cores to 4Ghz it be a little higher, ram is at 2933 ...
well i get about 18 UPS on my i7-920 + 3.4Ghz (24GB ram stock speeds)
the ryzen 1800x @ stock gets about 23 UPS, guess if i lock the cores to 4Ghz it be a little higher, ram is at 2933 ...
- Wed Aug 30, 2017 5:00 pm
- Forum: General discussion
- Topic: CPU performance benchmarks
- Replies: 169
- Views: 109353
Re: Anyone Ryzen Benchmarks?
I guess I should of Google ryzen factorio performance before I got it lol
still I am going from a first gen i7-920 to 1800x 3200 ram, so still going to be good enough to keep up with most hosts (I wount be that guy who can't keep up who is using a laptop to play factorio mutiplayer with a A4 amd ...
still I am going from a first gen i7-920 to 1800x 3200 ram, so still going to be good enough to keep up with most hosts (I wount be that guy who can't keep up who is using a laptop to play factorio mutiplayer with a A4 amd ...
- Mon Jun 05, 2017 6:25 pm
- Forum: Multiplayer
- Topic: command to find out who worked on last tile
- Replies: 0
- Views: 874
command to find out who worked on last tile
we are trying to work out who has been deconstructing stuff (tracks mainly) as i have seen somewhere in the past a command that can show who has worked on a tile that has been deconstructed (does it have to be in single player save not multiplayer) my google powers have failed me on this one
We ...
We ...
- Wed May 31, 2017 2:53 pm
- Forum: Technical Help
- Topic: Super laggy singleplayer (since .15?)
- Replies: 12
- Views: 5343
Re: Super laggy singleplayer (since .15?)
Its his hdd he has bad sectors on his diskBurnHard wrote:Do you have a browser-window open with eg youtube or some other video? This always kills my performance for some strange reason (i5-2500k@4Ghz, 16GB Ram)