And you didn't pick up on the extra "to" in "water to flow to in" in the tip? Shame!daniel34 wrote:Sorry to be pedantic, but you tend to attract a rather OCD crowd...
Search found 4 matches
- Fri Sep 15, 2017 8:43 pm
- Forum: News
- Topic: Friday Facts #208 - Tips and tricks improvement
- Replies: 58
- Views: 27765
Re: Friday Facts #208 - Tips and tricks improvement
- Mon Mar 27, 2017 2:39 am
- Forum: Logistic Train Network
- Topic: old LTN discussion thread
- Replies: 858
- Views: 320718
Re: [Mod 0.14] Logistic Train Network 0.9.8
What I would like to see is a signal for minimum % delivery. eg. don't send a delivery unless I am below, say, 50% stock of any individual item. Would work great for those items where ratios in the recipe are really high (like blue underground belt with a 20:1 ratio of gears to red underground). Th...
- Sun Mar 26, 2017 6:25 pm
- Forum: Logistic Train Network
- Topic: old LTN discussion thread
- Replies: 858
- Views: 320718
Re: [Mod 0.14] Logistic Train Network 0.9.8
EDIT: Also, has anyone got the "Ignore Minimum Delivery Size" condition input working? I have mine set on the provider, as the first post indicates, but a train is never dispatched to the provider, unless I increase the request to above the "Minimum Delivery Size" condition Deli...
- Sun Mar 26, 2017 5:57 pm
- Forum: Logistic Train Network
- Topic: old LTN discussion thread
- Replies: 858
- Views: 320718
Re: [Mod 0.14] Logistic Train Network 0.9.10
The problem is if the min request size is small enough that that much might be consumed while the delivery is in progress. In that example, if you order 10k red circuits, but if the train takes a minute to go get the circuits and deliver them, and you use 200 circuits in that time, you'll get anoth...