There are mods that let you create water, it's not possible in the standard game. (Mainly because creating indestructible walls is kinda cheesy.)

Also you'd have to make sure your moat, be it natural or otherwise, was wider than spitting distance.

Personally I would prefer it only be used for things that can also be named manually (so pretty much just train stops, currently). It kind of makes sense in that case, they need some kind of default name, and these are as good as any. I've never seen one I recognized, but some of them are kind of am...

ShiftNotSet.jpg As you can see these are mod-related controls, unsure if it can happen with the vanilla ones. Anyway, what happened is I right-clicked some of the commands to unset them, because I didn't plan on using them and didn't want to activate them by mistake or worry about conflicts. Initia...

In my last game, the first one where I seriously got into trains, I made a set of blueprints with two rails and large electric poles in between them. So that way I can do the rails and more or less power takes care of itself. Plus high power lines along railroad tracks are a common sight IRL, so it ...

That's a good point. I'm not saying you what you suggest is a bad idea, I'm just a little leery of the game making assumptions about what I want. For example, I might set an auto-trash limit of 50 for coal. This means "if I'm carrying more than 50 coal I don't want it", it doesn't necessar...

This seems like a good idea. What we have now really is kinda boring. I also feel that the current neighbor bonus (100%) is a little too strong. The fact that building your second reactor quadruples your power is kind of a shock! Taking non-immediate neighbors into account might help make that ramp ...

Do any mods add something like this? It seems like such a simple thing, I'm just wondering if maybe there's some reason it's harder to implement than it sounds.

This has been mentioned before, and unfortunately they didn't think it was worth fixing for some reason. Perhaps now that the game is entering more of a polishing stage they're reconsider. I know it's not a very big deal, it's just one of those things that's so clearly wrong that it really should to...

The rule is, it will transfer half of every stack (of one type if clicked on specifically), rounded down but at least one item, I don't see any of your examples breaking that. So basically ctrl+right-clicking just automates shift+right-clicking every stack? Huh. I guess that does explain the behavi...

Normally ctrl+right-click means transfer half. But it does unexpected things when the items involved don't stack (e.g. artillery shells or nuclear fuel). Note that this normally doesn't have anything to do with stack size (that would be shift+right-click), so I don't see why it should be different. ...

It would probably require some changes to the mechanics, but actually that makes alot of sense. Having very specific places wells have to be build is kind of weird.

Maybe a better solution would be to "spend" items from the trash slots first. For example when bots take items for blueprints or when your cursor or hot bar automatically "refills", it would take them from the trash slots preferentially.

You do not show that there is enough storage available. PlentyOfSpace.jpg But I guess it doesn't matter now. I still don't really understand what happened but after a while the bot "woke up", perhaps pressed into action by low batteries. And then it started flying off south-west. So best ...

StuckBot.jpg Highlighted: Construction Bot holding a Laser Turret. Storage Chest with plenty of space. "Insufficient logistic network storage space" warning. I'm still kind of a noob, so I don't want to jump the gun on reporting a bug, but I can't figure out what's going on here. This is ...

In the controls, you can rebind the blueprint next previous keys, and the landfill size keys. Are you saying that the game won't let you set them to the same key, or that it doesn't work properly if you set them up to use the same key? It will let you set it that way, but the tile (or fill) size co...

TL;DR Please add support for using the same keys for blueprint book next/previous and smaller/larger tile build size. What ? Since one only applies when you're holding a blueprint, and the other when you're holding a tile, there is no practical conflict, but if you try binding both sets to the same...

OK, after rechecking, it looks like this situation is actually this: However I also see the situation has improved somewhat since the version I reported this for. It's still possible get through sometimes with enough wiggling though.

Since version 0.16 I've notice that when walking along a shoreline, footstep sounds sometimes stop playing briefly. The surest way demonstrate this is to walk in a cardinal direction against a diagonal section of coastline.

Yes, I think the logic is that directly usable things like rails go to your quickbar instead. That said I do find the inconsistency a little annoying. Perhaps when they revamp the quickbar to be not an actual container this will change.

Well dang, I'm having all the bad luck. I guess it's just my computer. Never mind then.