+1 for a setting. since more settings is always better

-1 without setting, because I personally do really like the current aesthetics

TL;DR
Add a 0-100% axis to the accumulator charge graph


What?
Currently the y axis of the accumulator charge graph ranges from 0 Joules to the maximum that can be stored in the network
12-29-2025, 10-26-08.png

I propose that a second y axis label be shown that ranges from 0% to 100 ...

I am wondering what this does to the scale on the production graph... yeah producing and consuming 20K science packs per minute and what was that? 2.5M eSPM? And suddenly you can't see anything else on the production graph...
Perhaps giving eSPM its own tab like pollution or kills?


perhaps I ...

+1

+1 more flexibility is always good

Can you think of a way to disable your provider stations until a requester station exists? or perhaps even until a requester station can actually use the train? (Circuit network)

+1

TL;DR
A new type of rail signal that can change its behavior depending on the train that is looking at it


What?
Add a new type of rail signal that changes its behavior depending on the train that is looking at it. So that if a train is too long to fit in the block that the rail signal ...

+1 and bump

TL;DR
Science production graph should be with the other production graphs


What?
Currently the production statistics graph contains 5 tabs, Items, Fluids, Buildings, Pollution, Kills
08-21-2025, 22-36-12.png

And the science production graph, seen by hovering over a currently researching tech ...

+1 and bump

+1

thats actually the most ideal solution to a circuit logic that I've been cooking for months now

additional bump (it has been a week)

bump for 2.1

bumping this post in light of potential combinator reworks in 2.1

In light of version 2.1 and that an update for the arithmetic combinator is planned, I will bump this suggestion again.

this is what I get for only using one equipment (and getting unlucky) they were hiding underneath the machines... my bad lol, please move this to already implemented or something (or just delete it)

ok, to be honest I was assuming that the recycler would do the same thing, given that I tested the assembler about one hour ago in the latest version (2.0.43-3) because to me it makes no sense to have one of these fixed but not the other

EDIT just tested the recycler and I am correct, it does not ...

TL;DR
Prevent equipment loss if an item with an equipment grid (armors, vehicles) by making it impossible to use them in crafting


What?
Currently, using power armor MK2 in mech armor recipe, recycling anything with an equipment grid will permanently delete the equipment inside of the item ...

here is my take on it, including choosing output wire type

my bad I tried to search for it, but could not find it