Factorio Forums

oleg4f

mmmPI wrote: ↑
Tue Dec 08, 2020 5:23 am
Luckily there are some amazing mods out there! https://mods.factorio.com/mod/space-exploration .
Interesting mod. Thanks for the info!

The wireless signals are fun to use don't let the fact that they for are mods prevent you from using them !

oleg4f

In that situation you'd wire the train stop to the red input on the arithmetic combinator, and the constant combinator to the green input. Set the signals you want to pass to a value of 1 on the constant combinator and you're all set. Takes 2 combinators instead of 1 but otherwise exactly the same ...

oleg4f

AmericanPatriot wrote: ↑
Mon Dec 07, 2020 4:10 pm
In regards to logically complete train schedules: have you considered doing the logic with combinators and sending to the train?

Yes. But there are cases when a solution with combinators is cumbersome and gives unnecessary difficulties.

oleg4f

IMO the best way to solve this would be to allow combinators to choose which network (red or green) to read from with each input. Then you could use an arithmetic combinator set to (Each Red) * (Each Green) and wire the green input to a constant combinator listing the items you want to filter. That...

oleg4f

nosports wrote: ↑
Mon Dec 07, 2020 3:45 pm

oleg4f wrote: ↑
Mon Dec 07, 2020 12:43 pm

Do you talk about internal things or the interface?
There are logical combinators......

This isn't the same. There are logical combinators and train schedule. Why can't we have the logicaly complete train schedule?

oleg4f

I'd also like the post-endgame to be expanded in vanilla, so that I have the choice of either having 1k space science, better radar coverage, orbital weapons, increasing wireless transmission capacity, ... at every rocket launch. +1 But right now, we all need to rely on mods for that. That's sad.

oleg4f

I don't talk about nest OR or nest AND. No. imho, outer AND will be enough. And i don't think that this important improvement is so hard to implement

.

oleg4f

nosports wrote: ↑
Mon Dec 07, 2020 12:29 pm
is it not possible to do this with the logic-thingys already in the game....

Do you talk about internal things or the interface?

oleg4f

mmmPI wrote: ↑
Sat Dec 05, 2020 2:53 pm
You can do something that approach this already.

Thank you for the info, but i know how to do this with current set of combinators

. And this is cumbersome and inconvenient. If you need several such filters, then you get a monstrous ugly thing, which you want immediately destroy.

oleg4f

Guys, mods are not what i'm talking about :-). I'm talking about late-game gameplay, if you understand me ;-). The game isn't end on rockeet launch. We get 1k space science packs and possibility of infinite upgrades. So, the sat net can be one of such things. For example, after each rocket with sat ...

oleg4f

If we have in the future a train stop skip condition, then we should distinguish between these. Thus, if we take that into account(possible future improvements), the better label seems to be "add leave condition" or "add departure condition".

oleg4f

For example, in this scheme - viewtopic.php?f=194&t=92539 - the content of a payload wagon is leaked in a circuit net. When we need only a content of a wagon with markers. This problem can be solved with train stop filter or/with filter combinator.

oleg4f

I read it as he wants to filter the output of the read train contents by wagon. So he could say tell me the contents of the first wagon of the train. Exactly! What do you want to do? In setups where we have 1 supply train for several stations or 1 supply train for 1 station(with complex set of item...

oleg4f

I beleive what is being implied is the template is not being followed. i write the request according to this link. Here: "which looks ugly and hard to read." i specified why this is needed - to make life easier and easy to read/use of schedule. It obvious that need to transform every expr...

oleg4f

Koub wrote: ↑
Fri Dec 04, 2020 9:49 pm
You get Internet by satellite. Unfortunately, as there is no Internet infrastructure and nobody to communicate with, you're all alone on your network.

No problem. I need not another people in my net

, but i want use it to communicate with my circuit net devices without red/green wires.

oleg4f

And why do you need that? Hm. This is obvious and jodokus31 already answered this: To dont have to transform a complex condition to an even more complex and ugly to read condition. I have a case exactly like asheiduk wrote: (MANY_OR) AND TIME passed But factorio doesn't allow to write outer AND, th...

oleg4f

Hi. It would be nice to have a filter combinator. It interface can look like a constant combinator. We choose signals that can pass a filter. Then on output we see only that signals from combinator input which we selected. Next important feature is the possibility to set a filter from a circuit net....

oleg4f

Hi.

It would be nice if we have a filter with wagon numbers in train stop "read train contents" feature. With switch for "white list" and "black list" like in filter inserter. Thus we will be able to say to send only content of first wagon or all except first wagon.

oleg4f

Squelch wrote: ↑
Sat Dec 05, 2020 10:43 am
I think that simply dropping the word "wait" would be all that's needed.

Would "Add condition" become too ambiguous?

I thought about it too

. It's hard to say immediately. Need the experiment

.

oleg4f

I don’t see much difference. It depends from which side you’re seeing this. Here the correct sight is that of the train. Each tick this condition is checked, if false, it will wait. I think this “if false” is what’s irritating here. But as said wait is here an “until true”. It never bothered me, an...

Factorio Forums

Search found 54 matches

Re: wireless circuit net after sattelite launch

Re: filter combinator

Re: train schedule condition: outer AND support

Re: filter combinator

Re: train schedule condition: outer AND support

Re: wireless circuit net after sattelite launch

Re: train schedule condition: outer AND support

Re: train schedule condition: outer AND support

Re: filter combinator

Re: wireless circuit net after sattelite launch

Re: "add wait condition" seems wrong

Re: train stop "read train contents" filter

Re: train stop "read train contents" filter

Re: train schedule condition: outer AND support

Re: wireless circuit net after sattelite launch

Re: train schedule condition: outer AND support

filter combinator

train stop "read train contents" filter

Re: "add wait condition" seems wrong

Re: "add wait condition" seems wrong