[0.9+, Modding] Multiple Results for resource, overwhelm bug

[AlexPhoenix]

finded here: https://forums.factorio.com/forum/vie ... 375#p20375
for my tests i moddify CopperOre resource as follow:

Code: Select all

  {
    type = "resource",
    name = "copper-ore",
    icon = "__base__/graphics/icons/copper-ore.png",
    flags = {"placeable-neutral"},
    order="a-b-a",
    minable =
    {
		hardness = 0.5,
		mining_time = 10,
		results =
		{
			{
				name = "copper-ore",
				amount_min = 0,
				amount_max = 1,
				probability =0.1
			},
			{
				name = "iron-ore",
				amount_min = 0,
				amount_max = 1,
				probability = 0.1
			},
			{
				name = "coal",
          		amount_min = 0,
          		amount_max = 1,
          		probability = 0.1
        	}
        }
    },
    collision_box = {{ -0.1, -0.1}, {0.1, 0.1}},
    selection_box = {{ -0.5, -0.5}, {0.5, 0.5}},
    autoplace =
    {
      control = "copper-ore",
      sharpness = 1,
      richness_multiplier = 13000,
      richness_base = 350,
      size_control_multiplier = 0.06,
      peaks = {
        {
          influence = 0.2,
          starting_area_weight_optimal = 0,
          starting_area_weight_range = 0,
          starting_area_weight_max_range = 2,
        },
        {
          influence = 0.65,
          noise_layer = "copper-ore",
          noise_octaves_difference = -1.9,
          noise_persistence = 0.3,
          starting_area_weight_optimal = 0,
          starting_area_weight_range = 0,
          starting_area_weight_max_range = 2,
        },
        {
          influence = 0.3,
          starting_area_weight_optimal = 1,
          starting_area_weight_range = 0,
          starting_area_weight_max_range = 2,
        },
        {
          influence = 0.55,
          noise_layer = "copper-ore",
          noise_octaves_difference = -2.3,
          noise_persistence = 0.4,
          starting_area_weight_optimal = 1,
          starting_area_weight_range = 0,
          starting_area_weight_max_range = 2,
        },
        {
          influence = -0.2,
          max_influence = 0,
          noise_layer = "iron-ore",
          noise_octaves_difference = -2.3,
          noise_persistence = 0.45,
        },
        {
          influence = -0.2,
          max_influence = 0,
          noise_layer = "coal",
          noise_octaves_difference = -2.3,
          noise_persistence = 0.45,
        },
        {
          influence = -0.2,
          max_influence = 0,
          noise_layer = "stone",
          noise_octaves_difference = -3,
          noise_persistence = 0.45,
        },
      },
    },
    stage_counts = {1000, 600, 400, 200, 100, 50, 20, 1},
    stages = { filename = "__base__/graphics/entity/copper-ore/copper-ore.png",
      priority = "extra-high",
      frame_width = 38,
      frame_height = 38,
      frame_count = 4,
      direction_count = 8
    },
    map_color = {r=0.803, g=0.388, b=0.215}
  }

infinity or not doesnt matter.

At game happens next:
1)drill mine and mine for some time(near 10 times it mines before input)
2)then it output visually one item(but random from list) on ground(not in chest if any)
3)if there is a belt then you will see long tail of items from this "one item".

Show

if you place chest on then it will be filled in tick.

Show

i cannot determine count of mined ore, if was full iron chest and my inventory, but "one item" doesnt ended.

so, this must be resolved at sometime:)

[slpwnd]

Thanks for the report. This is a funny bug. It will be fixed for the 0.9.3. The problem is actually that your amount_min is 0 and amount_max is 1. That doesn't make sense because items can't be fractional and minimum should always be at least 1. So amount_min 1, amount_max 10 makes good sense for example. In your case, the amount of resource would be 0 which internally overflew to infinity

[AlexPhoenix]

Thanks for the report. This is a funny bug. It will be fixed for the 0.9.3. The problem is actually that your amount_min is 0 and amount_max is 1. That doesn't make sense because items can't be fractional and minimum should always be at least 1. So amount_min 1, amount_max 10 makes good sense for example. In your case, the amount of resource would be 0 which internally overflew to infinity

funny thing, thank you.

[slay_mithos]

Now, the only thing is to figure out a way to use this system for always getting one and only one result from the multiple results.

[kovarex]

Now, the only thing is to figure out a way to use this system for always getting one and only one result from the multiple results.

This would have to be programmed as special mode.