MAX/MIN functions

[nets]

I've occasionally run across needing to find the signal with the lowest value, same with the highest value, in a series of signals.

Code: Select all

MAX [S] in ( [S1]=5, [S2]=15, [S3]=99 ) => [S]=99

MIN [S] in ( [S1]=5, [S2]=15, [S3]=99 ) => [S]=5

The same I've run across a need to find easily (read: not turn into a cluster of combinators) to cap values at the bottom and top.

Code: Select all

[S]=6; If [S] > 5 Then [S]=5 Else [S]=[S]

[S]=1; If [S] < 2 Then [S]=2 Else [S]=[S]

PS: I *love* what you did with deciders 2.0, i hope wire by wire arithmetic can be done in the arithmetic combinator too!

[Roflhouse42]

Max/Min functions are supper annoying to build for train stops. Limiting the number of trains to not overwhelm your train stacker sucks. I would love for min/max to be added to the Arithmetic Combinator or the Decider Combinator. Its the most complex thing about making a train stop

[Nidan]

The same I've run across a need to find easily (read: not turn into a cluster of combinators) to cap values at the bottom and top.

Code: Select all

[S]=6; If [S] > 5 Then [S]=5 Else [S]=[S]

[S]=1; If [S] < 2 Then [S]=2 Else [S]=[S]

You can cap values on one side with one deciders, one arithmetic and two ticks; two deciders, two arithmetic and two ticks for both sides. If keeping signals in sync is important add two extra arithmetic combinators for adjusting delays.

I would love for min/max to be added to the Arithmetic Combinator or the Decider Combinator.

As per today's FFF, 2.0's selector combinator will have those functions.

[ickputzdirwech]

[Ick] Moved to Implemented in 2.0