There's going to be Uranium or whatever the Devs chose to use as radioactive fuel... you see the long-handed inserter below the reactor? I'd assume it's there to input the fuel material.Extended wrote:I am a bit disappointed by the "reactors", since there is no uranium. For me, making a "nuclear reactor" only based on water doesn't make sense.
Friday Facts #167 - Reactors Operational
Re: Friday Facts #167 - Reactors Operational
Re: Friday Facts #167 - Reactors Operational
I very like the reactor concept, but we need one thing: Better pipes building.
Re: Friday Facts #167 - Reactors Operational
You mean like a dropdown a robot that places pipes to the desired location kind of robot ?Cordylus wrote:I very like the reactor concept, but we need one thing: Better pipes building.
Logo
Noticed the told change in FFF #111 so il continue to use my signature ^_^Thanks for listening to our suggestions, devs !
I would jump of joy if we could specify which tiles spawned in a surfaces
Re: Friday Facts #167 - Reactors Operational
Yes! Having an option to disable the autoconnect so you can have parallel pipes next to each other without messing around with underground pipes would be nice.Cordylus wrote:I very like the reactor concept, but we need one thing: Better pipes building.
But I'm really looking forward to all of this. Exploring will be so much more fun with the new terrain and I'm looking forward to designing the new power plant layouts.
My friends and family are all about Christmas and New Years Eve, but the real holidays start when 0.15 is out
I'm wondering, is it really that much of a problem with the changed boiler size for people with steam powered factories?
Even if you need lot's of power, I assume it won't take very long to think of a new expandable layout, create blueprint and you have a new big power plant in a minute. And I'm sure people are sharing new efficient layouts on this forum and reddit on the first day already. I'm probably missing something but I'm curious what it will be.
Re: Friday Facts #167 - Reactors Operational
Finally a solution for the terrain that has been broken since the introduction of stone&concrete paving! I very much like that. I've been away from these recent versions of Factorio, still playing 0.12 mostly because I din't like the new polished aesthetics (mainly trains). This new terrain may very well change my mind yet again. That was a great terrain render indeed.
>>> Maxwell R. Black <<<
* * *
* * *
Re: Friday Facts #167 - Reactors Operational
Now that we're getting large boilers, will it be possible to finally pipe liquid fuels into them rather than making solid fuel?
-
- Fast Inserter
- Posts: 121
- Joined: Tue Jul 14, 2015 10:57 pm
- Contact:
Re: Friday Facts #167 - Reactors Operational
(Replying to myself, weee!)Rhamphoryncus wrote:Glad to see the boiler size got reworked. Figuring out build patterns will require more thought.. perhaps running the belt between boiler pairs in the bank in a perpendicular direction, rather than the traditional parallel..
I've found several unique, functional layouts so far, a good sign for the new boiler sizes! This one's my favourite:
The only potential "gotcha" is some of the layouts use pairs of boilers (one on each side of a belt), so if the ratio was an odd number of boilers like 1:5:10 you'd end up with two full sets and a mismatched half set. However, if the pipe throughput limit was high enough I could just double up the boilers and it would work out fine. Here's what I mean by pairs:
- Gertibrumm
- Fast Inserter
- Posts: 162
- Joined: Fri Jun 03, 2016 6:54 pm
- Contact:
Re: Friday Facts #167 - Reactors Operational
As an engineer I have some technical but also logical concerns:
1) I would like to see the new "boiler" more as a "heat exchanger" and NOT as a furnace which consumes coal!
2) furnaces could have reactor-like hot parts which connected to "heat exchangers" aka boiler to heat water to steam
3) it should be possible to burn everything in furnace or have different devices for different fuels just like the reactor is a furnace for uranium
4) making furnaces, which emit flue gases, pipe-connectable could create possibilities to use flue gases for filtration or water preheating like an economizer or maybe even burning of unburned gases like carbonmonoxide as a result of too compact furnace setups (no enough oxygen)
1) I would like to see the new "boiler" more as a "heat exchanger" and NOT as a furnace which consumes coal!
2) furnaces could have reactor-like hot parts which connected to "heat exchangers" aka boiler to heat water to steam
3) it should be possible to burn everything in furnace or have different devices for different fuels just like the reactor is a furnace for uranium
4) making furnaces, which emit flue gases, pipe-connectable could create possibilities to use flue gases for filtration or water preheating like an economizer or maybe even burning of unburned gases like carbonmonoxide as a result of too compact furnace setups (no enough oxygen)
Re: Friday Facts #167 - Reactors Operational
Yaaaaaas i love the new biome stuff. it'll be nice to see a new nauvis.
Re: Friday Facts #167 - Reactors Operational
That should be a fairly easy thing to add in a mod(adding what you describe and removing vanilla bits) once the heat pipe stuff has been added to the game. I'm personally a fan of some simplification at the expense of some realism to keep the early-mid game from becoming a bit tedious.Gertibrumm wrote:As an engineer I have some technical but also logical concerns:
1) I would like to see the new "boiler" more as a "heat exchanger" and NOT as a furnace which consumes coal!
2) furnaces could have reactor-like hot parts which connected to "heat exchangers" aka boiler to heat water to steam
3) it should be possible to burn everything in furnace or have different devices for different fuels just like the reactor is a furnace for uranium
4) making furnaces, which emit flue gases, pipe-connectable could create possibilities to use flue gases for filtration or water preheating like an economizer or maybe even burning of unburned gases like carbonmonoxide as a result of too compact furnace setups (no enough oxygen)
-A fellow IRL Engineer
- Gertibrumm
- Fast Inserter
- Posts: 162
- Joined: Fri Jun 03, 2016 6:54 pm
- Contact:
Re: Friday Facts #167 - Reactors Operational
I get that alot, maybe devs make up there mind. Because I dont have the time to make a moddelus wrote:Gertibrumm wrote:That should be a fairly easy thing to add in a mod
I am just most bothered that someone would shove coal into a heat exchanger and not the furnace
Re: Friday Facts #167 - Reactors Operational
Albert.... Wow. Stunning!
I'm all for larger boilers, for it will reduce number of inserters required for line of boilers.
I'm very, very, very disappointed on 3x2... why not 2x2 or 3x3?
Then, again, introducing high-temperature steam, and extracting energy from it using steam turbines, then last bit by current 'steam engines' (should be changed to Stirling generators!), which cool water down.
Introducing new mechanic of 'heat flow' is a bad idea, imo.
I'm all for larger boilers, for it will reduce number of inserters required for line of boilers.
I'm very, very, very disappointed on 3x2... why not 2x2 or 3x3?
Then, again, introducing high-temperature steam, and extracting energy from it using steam turbines, then last bit by current 'steam engines' (should be changed to Stirling generators!), which cool water down.
Introducing new mechanic of 'heat flow' is a bad idea, imo.
Veni, Vici, Spaghettici - never bus! (tm)
Re: Friday Facts #167 - Reactors Operational
I thought that the Reactor would be an alternative to the boilers, not to it's fuel. So the reactor would have it's own cold water input, hot water output and steam output, just like the boilers. That would pose a simplified dynamic to merge with the cooling towers and even further, the steam turbine would be an alternative to the steam engine, probably one that only works with the reactors. So, even though the steam engines do work with he steam from the reactor, it would be more space and/cost efficient to use steam turbines with them
-
- Manual Inserter
- Posts: 1
- Joined: Fri Dec 02, 2016 10:21 pm
- Contact:
Re: Friday Facts #167 - Reactors Operational
Hey just wanted to offer some quick feed back in regards to the broken decorative train tracks.
I am not so worried about the [why are there so many train tracks already here?], but I fee like individually, specifically, the way the metal rails are bent outward make it look like the whole line was carpet bombed, so much of the rails have been blown and bent outward so often. I feel like it should take considerable force to blast the rails bent so far, rather than simple decay. At least for how often in the example it appears.
That's all!
I am not so worried about the [why are there so many train tracks already here?], but I fee like individually, specifically, the way the metal rails are bent outward make it look like the whole line was carpet bombed, so much of the rails have been blown and bent outward so often. I feel like it should take considerable force to blast the rails bent so far, rather than simple decay. At least for how often in the example it appears.
That's all!
Re: Friday Facts #167 - Reactors Operational
It seemed to me like it was major biter damage, like, over time from bored biters after they eliminated the last hapless engineer.TartarusMkII wrote:Hey just wanted to offer some quick feed back in regards to the broken decorative train tracks.
I am not so worried about the [why are there so many train tracks already here?], but I fee like individually, specifically, the way the metal rails are bent outward make it look like the whole line was carpet bombed, so much of the rails have been blown and bent outward so often. I feel like it should take considerable force to blast the rails bent so far, rather than simple decay. At least for how often in the example it appears.
That's all!
Either way, the new tileset looks really, really good! Looking forward to it, and reactors too, even though I'm not the kind to theorycraft them.
-
- Manual Inserter
- Posts: 1
- Joined: Fri Dec 02, 2016 11:11 pm
- Contact:
Re: Friday Facts #167 - Reactors Operational
Great work so far! I can't wait for 0.15!
What would be really cool is if you guys implement some sort of multi-stage refining of nuclear fuel. Like say if you mine some uranium ore and refine it once, you could use the fuel right away (but with a low energy density), or run it through again and refine it more. The idea with that being the more you refine it, the more pure the fuel gets and it the more energy you get out of it per unit.
Perhaps after a great many refinings of the fuel it could become "weapons-grade" and be used in a new arsenal of weapons
What would be really cool is if you guys implement some sort of multi-stage refining of nuclear fuel. Like say if you mine some uranium ore and refine it once, you could use the fuel right away (but with a low energy density), or run it through again and refine it more. The idea with that being the more you refine it, the more pure the fuel gets and it the more energy you get out of it per unit.
Perhaps after a great many refinings of the fuel it could become "weapons-grade" and be used in a new arsenal of weapons
Re: Friday Facts #167 - Reactors Operational
If you can't wait, the "FlowControl" mod does this. It allows you to convert between the base "autoconnect" pipes and fixed-shape variants (straight, curve, T). That is, there are instant 1:1 recipes for each fixed shape, and they all deconstruct back to basic pipes.Vinnie_NL wrote:Yes! Having an option to disable the autoconnect so you can have parallel pipes next to each other without messing around with underground pipes would be nice.
Re: Friday Facts #167 - Reactors Operational
Can't wait for nuclear power... it was suggested so long ago and its finally becoming a reality.
also, that new red desert biome looks like the sex.
also, that new red desert biome looks like the sex.
Re: Friday Facts #167 - Reactors Operational
I respectfully disagree.delus wrote: That should be a fairly easy thing to add in a mod(adding what you describe and removing vanilla bits) once the heat pipe stuff has been added to the game. I'm personally a fan of some simplification at the expense of some realism to keep the early-mid game from becoming a bit tedious.
-A fellow IRL Engineer
There wouldn't be any additional items added that you wouldn't already craft other than heat pipes-just the way you arrange them and the space needed.
The boiler-furnace idea is intuitive(at least to me...)-The boiler needs heat, the heat pipes transfer heat, and the furnaces produce it. That's about as simple as it can get short of what's the case right now.
it's a natural extension of the heat pipes idea, and would introduce that idea early on.(As well as other extensions of the heat pipe system-solar thermal power and molten salt heat storage anyone?)
It mostly needs cosmetic changes to make the connection more obvious. Such as visible heat pipe connectors on the furnaces, that look the same as the ones on the boilers.
The difficulty would be that it would increase the space required for a burner boiler set, and (given the burner furnaces are 2x2) in a somewhat awkward way. That's going to be the main tradeoff Wube will have to consider vs keeping the boiler's burner capabilities.
But I'm neither an engineer nor a game developer.
Re: Friday Facts #167 - Reactors Operational
Wow , I didn't know someone did that already. Was taht easy?Khaim wrote:If you can't wait, the "FlowControl" mod does this. It allows you to convert between the base "autoconnect" pipes and fixed-shape variants (straight, curve, T). That is, there are instant 1:1 recipes for each fixed shape, and they all deconstruct back to basic pipes.Vinnie_NL wrote:Yes! Having an option to disable the autoconnect so you can have parallel pipes next to each other without messing around with underground pipes would be nice.