You can have custom quality prototypes and still have the Quality mod generate missing levels programmatically. Positioning those custom prototypes on the level line is just a compatibility issue. Nothing that mods aren't handling already.Hares wrote: Wed Feb 19, 2025 8:27 pm Ideally, we don't want hardcoded quality levels as mods can change that (i.e. add or remove levels), so we need either tuple-factor as was suggested above, or use expression formula like "80 + 20*q", and we definitely would need a special flag "override_quality_control" (default: false) on prototypes to even enable this parsing.
Add more ways for quality to affect items
Re: [2.0.14] Add more ways for quality to affect items
- protocol_1903
- Filter Inserter

- Posts: 397
- Joined: Fri Sep 09, 2022 4:33 pm
- Contact:
Re: [2.0.14] Add more ways for quality to affect items
This. Quality should be specified as formulae, so developers can specify what properties can (and can't) be affected by quality, and at what levels.Hares wrote: Wed Feb 19, 2025 8:27 pm Ideally, we don't want hardcoded quality levels as mods can change that (i.e. add or remove levels), so we need either tuple-factor as was suggested above, or use expression formula like "80 + 20*q", and we definitely would need a special flag "override_quality_control" (default: false) on prototypes to even enable this parsing.
Py and PyBlock developer, wielder of LUA in arbitrary ways. I make mods. Check them out, maybe.
https://mods.factorio.com/user/protocol_1903
https://mods.factorio.com/user/protocol_1903
Re: Add more ways for quality to affect items
Was anything done with this and went unnoticed or is it still hardcoded?
Re: Add more ways for quality to affect items
Both. Devs periodically provide more ways for quality to affect prototypes, but it's still only few properties, and all of them are hardcoded.gujarat6 wrote: Thu Nov 20, 2025 3:31 pm Was anything done with this and went unnoticed or is it still hardcoded?
Fulgora is the best planet. Vulcanus needs rework. Feel free to prove me wrong.

