if you ask me, this way to generate power on vulcanus is broken and unfun.

So just use solar, which is extremely cheap to build on Vulcanus. The only downside is the space requirement (but even that is still much less than on Nauvis).


You obviously use the method that works best. That's why ...

Rseding91 wrote: Thu Jun 05, 2025 6:57 pm Thanks for the report however this simply doesn't matter.

Man I think you need a proper holiday, I can recommend Bali.

I know that rampant exists but what I mean is more that biters act like in a RTS game, e.g. send out patrols, continue trying to kill your base after they found it, even if it stopped producing pollution.

I know factorio aint no RTS but I kinda miss that you really can be defeated in this game. Like if biters would patrol ssometimes, looking for enemies, just stuff that happens independent of the polution cloud.

What do u guys think?

Agree with OP, cheesing legendary quality like that should ot be possible. Im sure this is on the devs list for 2.1.

Don't worry guys, at some point they will reintroduce the 1.1 fluid system into Space Age upon which the game will be un-ruined again.

Probably everyone is playing Space Age

probably not and maybe it will be changed.

quineotio wrote: Mon May 05, 2025 5:01 am Some more thoughts.

Well written post mate with some very valid points, it hits right on the mark.

Just ignore these shitposters coming into polute and obfuscate your thread with endless nonsence, you really understand what's going on. Let's see how stuff will move forward with SA.

Can you ustill drive the old way? The idea of having tte car 'snap' to one of 8 directions doesnt sound appealing to me.

Hefty update, stuff happening, good work

No you cannot, Space Age depends on Quality.

Man your walls of text make no sense, we point out something and enough is explained for devs to understand. They can do with it what they want.

I see what you are doing, obfuscating every thread you don't like with walls of text which at first sight seem like valid argumentation but it's just ...

mmmPI wrote: Mon Apr 28, 2025 1:25 pm *personal attack*

Plz stay ontopic

I use both, suck away the big dust blobs with a vac then blow the remaining stuff out with the compressor.

Man I already did that before him, with the added complexity of using only the strictly required techs. Can lookup my save if you want.

Ontopic:
Summary of my view:
Regardless of what other people say, it's clear that the current design philosopy of the dev team is being able to plan the game ...

That is not really a good solution.

You have no respect, it's clear you don't want any changes in the line we are discussing here, we have heard that enough now, GTFO and make your own thread.

Look we know you don't like it, you don't need to keep repeating it only to have the last word. Just have some respect and GTFO another person's topic or actually suggest something better in the same line. Only repeating 'no' is just respectless, we know that by now.

Nah you're not contributing anything atm.

Ontopic:
What if we temporarily make solar panel prereq of Space science technology? This will fix the inconsistency. I really have to add tho that I prefer the other suggestion of being able to get by without solar in space and until Aquilo but that will ...